Boater Safety Information
- Excerpts from U.S. Coast Guard Notice to Mariners
- U.S. Coast Guard Notice to Mariners
- Excerpt from Federal Register concerning U.S. Coast Guard’s RNA
- U.S. Coast Guard Boater Safety Press Release
- NNYB Boater Safety Project Update
- U.S. Coast Guard Extended RNA Map
- U.S. Coast Guard’s Temporary Navigational Lights Map
In October 2013, temporary navigational lights were relocated as per the diagram below at the existing Tappan Zee Bridge across the Hudson River at mile 27.0. The new temporary navigational lighting plan includes marking the 600 foot wide main channel by affixing four-180° steady, red navigation lights to the underside of the main span, 2 each on the upstream and downstream sides of the structure, 300 feet either side of the centerline of the bridge. Each green center of channel light has 3 white lights stacked vertically above it. The center 600′ feet of the Main Navigation Channel will be free for the passage of marine traffic and clear of all obstructions at all times.
- U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Approved Mooring Locations
The map below is from the January 14, 2014 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers permit modification for the New NY Bridge Project to replace the Tappan Zee. It shows the approved temporary mooring locations for construction barges on the Hudson River during the project. There will be barges moored at these approved locations both day and night during the project and there will be up to 100 barges, crew boats and other vessels in the area at the peak of construction. Originally, there were 4 mooring locations established in the spring of 2013. 12 additional areas have been approved and the initial 4 will also be reconfigured. The U.S. Coast Guard has issued the following guidance in its Notice to Mariners: “When transiting the area mariners should stay clear of these locations by a minimum of 1000 feet. Mariners are advised to transit the main channel, reduce wake and use extreme caution while transiting the area in the vicinity of the Tappan Zee Bridge paying particular attention to vessel movement and future notices.
- U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Permit
Design-Build Contract with Tappan Zee Constructors
Redactions under the Freedom of Information Law
Please be advised that certain records have been redacted or withheld in accordance with the following subsections of New York State’s Public Officers Law §87(2):
Portions of the records have been redacted or withheld in their entirety under section 87(2)(a) as the information is specifically exempted from disclosure by state or federal statute. [Including, but not limited, to 49 USC §40119 and by extension 49 CFR, Part 15.
Portions of the records have been redacted or withheld under section 87(2)(b) on the ground that disclosure of the information would constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy under the provisions of Public Officers Law section 89(2).
Portions of the records have been redacted or withheld under section 87(2)(d) as the information constitutes trade secrets or was submitted to an agency by a commercial enterprise or derived from information obtained from a commercial enterprise and which if disclosed would cause substantial injury to the competitive position of the subject enterprise.
Portions of the records have been redacted or withheld under section 87(2)(f) on the ground that disclosure of the information could endanger the life or safety of any person.
Portions of the records have been redacted or withheld under section 87(2)(i) on the ground that disclosure would jeopardize the capacity of an agency or an entity that has shared information with an agency to guarantee the security of its information technology assets, such assets encompassing both electronic information systems and infrastructures.
- Part 1 – Agreement
- Part 2 – DB Section 100 General Provisions
- Part 3 – Project Requirements
- Part 4 – Utility Requirements
- Part 5 – Special Provisions
- Part 5 – Section 5.1
- Part 5 – Section 5.2
- Part 6 – RFP Plans
- Part 7 – Engineering Data
- Part 7 – Attachment A
- Part 8 – Special Specifications
- Part 9 – Design Build Proposal
- Price Proposal
- TZC Financials
Project Reports
- Methodology for Estimating Economic Impact of the New NY Bridge Project May 2, 2013
- Report of the Independent Procurement Integrity Monitor January, 2013
- Blue Ribbon Selection Committee Report November 30, 2012
- Owner’s Engineer Request for Letters of Interest September 2012
- Thruway Authority Board of Directors resolution regarding selection of design-build team for new NY Bridge September 17, 2012
Federal funding participation (TIFIA) Documents
- Fiscal Year 2012 Letter of Interest for Federal funding participation (TIFIA) U.S. Department of Transportation TIFIA Credit Program
- Fiscal Years 2013 and 2014 Letter of Interest for Federal funding participatio (TIFIA) U.S. Department of Transportation TIFIA Credit Program
- The “New” New York Bridge Project Support Materials for TIFIA Financing Request
- Bridge Toll Options
Request For Proposals (RFP)
To continue to promote an open and transparent procurement process, this RFP document is being provided for informational purposes only. No public comments relating to the RFP are being solicited or responded to. The Public Comment period is closed.
Section 1503 of SAFETEA-LU (August 10, 2005) revised design-build regulations to provide for increased flexibility in initiating the design-build procurement process as it relates to the completion of the environmental review process. This flexibility has been consistent with the Administration’s Every Day Counts Initiative, which encourages conducting project delivery concurrently to the extent allowable. It allowed State transportation departments to issue request for proposals and preliminary design work under design-build contracts prior to the completion of the NEPA process. This revision also allows states to realize sooner the advantages of time and cost savings and improved quality for projects that use design-build procurement. Since the RFP has been issued prior to the conclusion of the NEPA process, the document informs the proposers that no commitment will be made to any alternative under evaluation in the NEPA process, including the no-build alternative. The document includes appropriate provisions ensuring that all environmental and mitigation measures identified in the NEPA document will be implemented.
Final version as of November 21, 2012
- Instructions to Proposers
- Part 1 – Agreement
- Part 2 – DB Section 100 General Provisions
- Part 3 – Project Requirements
- Part 4 – Utility Requirements
- Part 5 – Special Provisions
- Part 5 – Section 5.1
- Part 5 – Section 5.2
- Part 6 – RFP Plans
- Part 7 – Engineering Data
- Part 7 – Attachment A
- Part 8 – Special Specifications
- Reference Documents
Request For Qualifications (RFQ)
The New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT) and the New York State Thruway Authority (NYSTA) – collectively, the Agencies – have issued a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for firms interested in participating in the design and construction of a new bridge across the Hudson River near Tarrytown, New York. The RFQ documentation can be accessed at the link(s) below. The RFQ sets out the pre-qualification process for firms seeking to be short-listed as project Proposers, and it provides details of the Statement of Qualifications (SOQs) required from interested firms. The deadline for submitting SOQs was January 10, 2012.
On January 10, 2012, Statements of Qualification were received from world class design-build teams. After evaluation, a shortlist of the most highly qualified teams has been announced. The teams listed on the shortlist below will be invited to respond to a Request for Proposals.
Scope Summary Report
This Scoping Summary Report incorporates information provided in the Scoping Information Packet for the Tappan Zee Hudson River Crossing Project, lists public and agency comments on the Scoping Information Packet, responds to the comments received, and includes updated information as necessary to address the public comments. Updated or revised text is shown in italics throughout this document. This document describes the purpose and need for the project (Section 1); the alternatives under consideration (Section 2); the framework for the project’s environmental analysis (Section 3); the public involvement program for the project (Section 4), and agency and public comments and responses (Section 5).
The purpose of the project is to maintain a vital link in the regional and national transportation network by providing a Hudson River crossing between Rockland and Westchester Counties, New York that addresses the limitations and shortcomings of the existing Governor Malcolm Wilson Tappan Zee Bridge (“Tappan Zee Bridge”). The project would address the structural, operational, safety, security and mobility needs of the Tappan Zee Hudson River Crossing.
- Section 1 – Purpose and Need
- Section 2 – Alternatives Development and Evaluation
- Section 3 – Environmental Analysis Framework
- Section 4 – Public Involvement and Agency Coordination
- Section 5 – Public and Agency Comments and Responses
- Appendix A – White Paper on Transit and the Tappan Zee Hudson River Crossing Project
- Appendix B – List of Public Comments on the Scoping Information Packet
Section 106 Consulting Parties Initiation Packet
Methodology
Area of Potential Effect (APE) Materials
- Memorandum on Proposed APE, October 14, 2011
- Map of Direct and Indirect Areas of Potential Effect
- Map of Historical Properties within APE
- North Rockland Map of Historic Properties within APE
- South Rockland Map of Historic Properties within APE
- North Westchester Map of Historic Properties within APE
- South Westchester Map of Historic Properties within APE
Historic Resources Inventory Forms (Blue Forms)
- South Nyack Historic District
- River Road Historic District
- 2 Shadyside Avenue
- 10 Ferris Lane
- 129 Piermont Avenue
- 135 Piermont Avenue
- 147 Piermont Avenue
- Glenwolde Park Historic District
- Irving Historic District
- South End Historic District
- Tappan Landing Historic District
- 99 White Plains Road
- 100 White Plains Road
- Washington Irving Gardens
- Hope United Presbyterian Church
- Tarrytown Sewage Treatment
Correspondence
- Letter of October 17, 2011 from NYSDOT to State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO), APE Transmittal
- Letter of October 27, 2011 from SHPO to NYSDOT, Concurrence Re Establishment of APE
- Letter of November 8, 2011 from NYSDOT to SHPO, Transmittal of Documentation Package
- Letter of November 16, 2011 from SHPO to NYSDOT, Concurrence Re Eligibility Recommendations
- Letter of November 18, 2011 from SHPO to NYSDOT, Concurrence Re Rehabilitation